Latest Offenders Swindon

Description

A Swindon man has been jailed for more than three years after he pleaded guilty to multiple offences relating to indecent images of children.

Adrian Weston, 37, of Haydon End, appeared at Swindon Crown Court on November 4 and pleaded guilty to arranging/facilitating the commission of a child sex offence, three counts of making indecent photographs of a child, possessing a prohibited image of a child, distributing an indecent photo of a child, two counts of attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child and possession of extreme pornographic image.
 
He was jailed for 42 months and given an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order.
 
Back in the summer of 2021, we received information relating to Weston and indecent images of children. He was arrested and over 300 ‘Category A’ indecent images of children were found on his devices. Category A refers to those depicting the most serious child abuse.
 
Whilst released under investigation, Weston engaged with an undercover police officer online who he believed to be an adult male who had an 11-year-old step-daughter. Weston encouraged him to record himself sexually assaulting his step-daughter whilst she slept and to then send him the footage.
 
Detective Constable Justine Parsons, from Wiltshire Police’s Child Internet Exploitation Team, said: “When officers attended Weston’s address on the second occasion, he attempted to delay opening the door to officers so he could swap the SIM card on his phone and destroy evidence.
 
“We hope this case highlights the work carried out by our team to identify offenders who access these images and ensure they are put before the courts.”

Description

A convicted sex offender posed as a paediatric doctor and effectively manipulated three women into having relationships with him.

Jeremy van der Sanden was subject to a sexual harm prevention order that gave police the power to monitor his devices and that he must tell police if he got a new device, or stayed at a different address.

But Swindon Crown Court heard on Friday (July 29) that van der Sanden, of The Heights in Kingshill, posed as a doctor online to enter into a relationship with an unsuspecting woman.

He used a different name, itself a breach of notification requirements he was subject to.

Summing up, Judge James Townsend also said he posed as a woman to enter into a social media relationship.

You worryingly posed as a paediatric doctor and entered into a relationship with an unsuspecting woman, he told the defendant.

That posed a clear risk, not only to her but also because you could have come into contact with children.

The three people you have effectively manipulated have been badly affected by your deception.

I bear in mind that the offences on the face of them dont appear to be an effort to gain access to children.

But, the judge continued: A troubling feature of this case is in spite of the fact you have a highly supportive family, and in spite of the fact there has been intervention by the probation service, you have continued to offend.

The facts of these offences and the troubling contents of the pre-sentence report suggest you remain capable of manipulating people and I suspect to some extent you are a fantasist.

The court was also told that the 27-year-old had been subject to a community order for possession of Class A indecent images of children.

Van der Sanden had pleaded guilty to two counts of breaching his sexual harm prevention order, namely not notifying police of his address or new laptop, and three counts of breaching his notification requirements.

This included using an undisclosed name and staying at an address for more than seven days in a year and not notifying the police.

He was given a total sentence of 19 months imprisonment, which Judge Townsend said would be immediate.

The community order was revoked.

Van der Sanden will also be subject to a new sexual harm prevention order, under the same terms, that will last until May 2032.

Description

A SHOP worker has been jailed after she groomed a teenager into having sex with her. Ellee Nicoll bought the girl presents, gave her money, called her pretty and paid other compliments before they declared their love for each other and engaged in sexual activity. It was heard the now 25-year-old Walcot woman cultivated the relationship, engaging in months of sexting with the teen, and decided to watch a lesbian film with her to normalise what [she] wanted to happen. It was not until the girls mother became concerned at how close the pair were and told the teenager what grooming may look like that the penny dropped, leading to her feeling sick about what had happened. Sentencing her to immediate prison, Judge Jason Taylor QC said that alarm bells should have been ringing loud and clear in your mind, but you were seemingly tone death. He acknowledged the victims mental health struggles and said that Nicoll must have realised what her grooming meant to her. She was jailed for two years and two months. Opening the case at Swindon Crown Court on Thursday (May 26), prosecutor Andrew Houston said that Nicoll, who works at a Swindon Co-Op, initially became friends with the girl, and that the victim looked up to her like a big sister. But the relationship quickly changed, he said, with the victim making the first move to turn the conversation to sexting, and also sending her pictures of her naked and in underwear. It was claimed that Nicoll sent pictures back, although this was disputed by the defence. As time went on, messages recovered showed heavy sexual flirtation between the two, and associates of the defendant realised that the pair were touchy feely and that they would smack each other on the bottom. Mr Houston said that Nicolls mother had warned her to stay away from the schoolgirl, but she ignored the warnings. Events came to a head one night where the girls mother offered Nicoll a place to stay when she had a family disagreement, and not realising the closeness of the girls, said they could share a bed. He told the court that they watched a lesbian film in bed, they then agreed to do stuff to each other. In the following days, Nicoll described it as the best night of her life, and the victim said she had no regrets. Mitigating, Gareth James said the offending was out of character and that it has had a devastating effect on her already. She does seem to be a defendant who can properly and accurately be described as a vulnerable defendant herself and perhaps immature, and perhaps didnt think through the consequences of her actions, having effectively fallen for feelings she shouldnt have had, Mr James said. He added that it has had a significant adverse impact on his clients mental health and she is voluntarily working to address this. He pleaded with Judge Taylor to impose a suspended sentence. He said: Given the undoubted effect already upon Miss Nicoll and her concerns for her future problems and the work she has already undertaken on a voluntary basis, [this] demonstrates very clearly there is a significant prospect of rehabilitation. Sentencing, Judge Taylor acknowledged that Nicoll did not set out to groom the girl, but that grooming occurred nonetheless. When she sent you naked images of herself, the appropriate thing to do was gently say it is not appropriate. You didnt. You had become so desensitised from her age it didnt give you pause for thought in the cold hard light of day. No regrets for [the victim] turned to embarrassment, and by the time she was interviewed by police, she felt sick. Sometimes teenagers just need to be protected from themselves. Judge Taylor continued: Whilst female offending of this type is more unusual, it is no less serious. There is still a child victim who will be affected by what you did. Experience of the courts has shown this time and time again. For that reason, even if the sentence had been within the range of being suspendable, I would have reluctantly said appropriate punishment could only be achieved by immediate imprisonment. Having pleaded guilty to sexual activity with a child and sexual communication with a child, Nicoll, of Concord Walk, Walcot, was jailed for two years and two months. A sexual harm prevention order was made for 10 years, as was a restraining order preventing her from contacting the victim.

Description

A SEX offender has finally run out of luck after he was jailed for failing to attend a probation appointment just eight days after he was given a last chance. Callum MacHardie was warned by Judge Jason Taylor QC that one more breach of his suspended sentence, issued in 2021 after he was convicted of possessing indecent images of children for the second time, would mean prison. That warning came in March after several missed appointments, but just eight days later, he failed to attend another probation appointment. That was followed, prosecutor Rebekah Batt said, by two missed i-Horizon appointments in April. She also outlined that none of the 150 hours of unpaid work has been completed so far and that just one of the 15 rehabilitation activity days have been completed. Ms Batt added that he had been in contact with probation on May 4, but he had engaged in abusive behaviour with his offender manager. Probation were now recommending that the suspended sentence was activated, she said. Defending, John Simmons acknowledged that the court might take the view that the order was falling apart, but said his mental health issues, including that he had been diagnosed with emotionally unstable personality disorder, means he finds it hard to comply with the order. He cited a psychiatric report which said that his coping capability in a custodial setting would be limited, and that he should be managed in the community. I respectfully suggest that if each of these requirements was an order to walk 100 yards and he was in a wheelchair, he would be unable to do it and we would see that, Mr Simmons said. Hes equally sick in a different way, hes unable to do it. We shouldnt be that surprised he hasnt engaged in the way everyone wants him to. But, Mr Simmons said, his client, of Arley Close in Haydon, had been seeking help from a psychologist and made contact with his GP on numerous occasions. He asked the judge to adjourn sentencing for four weeks, to allow the new supervisors time to work with him. But Judge Taylor, at pains to decide between giving him another chance and whether MacHardie had reached the end of the road, said that his risk must be managed. I cannot ignore this, they are saying when he doesnt attend his appointments, we are unable to manage his risks, he is simply not engaging with us, the judge concluded. Mr Simmons invites me to put it back four weeks. It might just make the difference. But Ive got to manage the risk in those four weeks. I am aware having been given the chance on the 21st [March], eight days later it was a different ball game. Addressing the 32-year-old, Judge Taylor said: Whilst I take absolutely no pleasure in doing this, you have been given chance after chance. That ends today. MacHardie must now serve the 18-month prison sentence. A previous hearing had been told the defendant had been downloading the illegal material since he was 12. In 2016, his barrister said his childhood was blighted by bullying and isolation. He was given a community order, and after breaching it by again downloading indecent images of children and using a computer network capable of hiding his web activity from the authorities, that was upgraded to a suspended sentence.

Description

A woman who molested another woman on a train has escaped having to register as a sex offender.

26-year-old human resources professional Jodie Tucker will not have to go to a police station and sign the sex offenders register after receiving an unusual sentence term.

District Judge Joanna Dickens imposed an eleven-month community order despite the probation service asking for the order to be for a period of twelve months or longer.

Most community orders are 12, 18 or 24 months in length but by reducing the term by one month, Tucker escaped gaining the title of registered sex offender, despite being a sex offender.

Swindon Magistrates Court this morning (23 May) heard how she touched the womans knee, before moving up her thigh and to her vagina over the victims clothing.

Shocked and upset about Tuckers behaviour, she told her to stop. But she continued regardless placing her hand in the victims lap and touching her inner thighs for a second time.

As a result, the victim who goes to university says she has started suffering from a number of mental health issues, including stress-induced hair loss, mood swings, struggles to concentrate and nightmares where Tucker is standing over her and she feels like shes trapped and cant move.

Defence solicitor Mr Davis said his client, of Hathaway Road, Upper Stratton, Swindon, accepted she was on the train and had consumed a lot of alcohol describing her as very, very, very drunk.

He said Tucker doesnt have any recollection of her crime, but she has never disputed the incident and accepts the victim who was helping her get home was only trying to do the decent thing.

Tucker isnt the first sex offender to get away with having to register as one. An accomplished solicitor who sexually assaulted two women at a Wiltshire pub didnt have to either.

Thomas Cadman brazenly approached his victims and groped them last year, but magistrates imposed a nine-month community order despite the probation service asking for a 12-month order.

This meant that instead of registering as a sex offender for five years, he avoided it altogether.

Description

A paedophile pensioner was told you thoroughly deserve it by the judge who caged him for 29 years. On Friday, sick sex offender Rick Passway was finally made to pay for a catalogue of abuse against six women and girls in the 1970s and 1980s. They included the rape of one woman in Faringdon in the mid-80s just days after she had a hysterectomy operation in Swindon to remove part of her womb. Passway, then a taxi driver, had driven her home from the hospital before raping her on the floor of her living room. Another victim was a child and teenager when she was repeatedly sexually abused by the man over the course of several years. He also pawed four other victims, who were aged eight to 14 when they were touched by him. 'No mercy' Sentencing the 77-year-old at Oxford Crown Court on Friday, Judge Nigel Daly blasted: Your treatment of your [first victim, who was repeatedly raped as a child] was despicable. Youve heard what she has to say about that. Youve taken away her childhood. You have ruined her adult life. The rape of your [second victim, who was sexually assaulted in the mid-80s] was shocking in the extreme. In respect of the other offences, it is quite clear you were unable to keep your hands off young women and would sexually assault them at any opportunity, repeating it again and again and again because you never got caught and you were never punished. You showed your victims no mercy. You showed them no compassion and you have displayed no remorse or contrition since - either at trial or since. Sending him down for 29 years, the judge added: That is the sentence upon you. You thoroughly deserve it. Mitigation Earlier, John Cammegh QC said: I have asked Mr Passway whether he has remorse. I am bound by my instructions. I am afraid I cannot, despite having spoken to Mr Passway just now, offer any remorse flowing from him because he denies the majority of these offences took place. He added: Mr Passway knows he is going to die in prison. Passway, of Bunce Road, Swindon, was found guilty over two trials of rape, indecent assault and indecency with a child. He was sentenced for 22 counts in total, including six counts of rape. The offences were committed in Wantage, Faringdon and Fairford. Judge Daly imposed an extended year on licence, but noted that the defendant would be well into his 90s before he was eligible for release on parole. Senior Crown prosecutor James Bailey-Woodward for the Crown Prosecution Services Rape and Serious Sexual Offences unit said: Rick Passway unashamedly preyed on young girls for years, creating a culture of fear and intimidation to ensure that they would not speak out about his despicable crimes, allowing his offences to become more and more serious. He then denied any wrongdoing. Its thanks to the courage of his victims that we were able to put him before a jury who found him guilty.

Description

A crossdresser exposed himself to a teenager before targeting other young ladies outside a college near from his home in Swindon, a court heard. Andrew Keen, 41, was sentenced at Swindon Magistrates Court yesterday (27 April), after admitting an indecent exposure offence and two charges of causing harassment, alarm or distress. Prosecutor Kate Prince said the defendant, of Clanfield Road, Park North, approached a lone 17-year-old girl just 250 metres from his address and asked her for the time on 26 September last year. But things turned odd when Keen who was wearing womens clothing asked if he could have her top and bottoms for a charity. She declined, and he went on to ask if she could sign his skirt. After bending down to sign his skirt with a lipstick he provided, he lifted his top and showed her his genitals which were poking out of his skirts waistband. Shocked, confused and scared, she agreed to his second request for her to have a photograph with him, which she took on her own mobile phone. He asked if he could put this arm around her, but she said no. The next day, Keen ventured out again this time targeting a 16-year-old girl outside New College. He asked her: Will you take your clothes off so I can have them?, claiming it was for charity, before asking her for her phone number. The victim called the police to report the encounter. On 28 September, he accosted a 17-year-old girl as she got off the bus on Queens Drive, near New College. He asked her for the time before asking if he could borrow her clothes for charity. He went on to request that she takes her clothing off. Worried about his behaviour, she ran into the college and reported the incident. In a statement to police, she said she is now scared and anxious about going to college. Mr Prince said the defendant was identified by the photograph the initial victim was asked to take on her own mobile phone. Defending, Sam Arif described her client as a loner, who was struggling with his sexuality. She said older generations of his family could not accept it. She added that Keen saw the approaches as opportunities to talk to young women who he believed would be more open to his sexuality. Ms Arif said he stopped offending as soon as she was spoken to by the police, who were investigating the spate of concerning incidents. She said Keen has a myriad of issues and learned about things via the internet, rather than via the appropriate channels. She added that he has found it difficult to deal with his family situation and with who he wants to be. Ms Arif said his crimes could have been worse claiming they were very short encounters. Chief magistrate Martin Clarke told the defendant that the bench was considering sending him to prison for his crimes. Weve been thinking long and hard about what to do with you. Whats worrying here is that you deliberately target certain young females, these are young girls, young ladies, very young. One of them has actually said she was shocked and confused, she didnt have a clue what you were talking about. Thats worrying Mr Keen. Our range is from a community penalty to sending you to prison today, thats how serious this is serious. Mr Clarke imposed a 24-month community order and banned Keen from going near both New College sites for 12 months which will be monitored by a GPS tag. He must also complete 15 rehabilitation activity requirement days, 200 hours of unpaid work and register as a sex offender for five years. Talking about the order as a whole, Mr Clarke added: If you break that and end up in that area, you could be going out that back door instead of the front door.

Description

A SWINDON paedophile described as a monster for abusing friendships with women to sexually assault their young daughters and take indecent pictures of them has been jailed for 50 months. Prosecutor Anjal Gohil told Gloucester Crown Court Shaun Couling of The Green, Highworth, had become friendly wth a number of mothers in the Cotswolds town and that enabled him to get access to their daughters. The first victim was aged 11 and was the daughter of a woman friend and when he was in their home he got hold of the young girls breasts and bounced them up and down and warned her not to say anything to anybody, the prosecutor said. On the second occasion he put his hand down her pants and touched her private parts, but did not penetrate her. She knows that on that occasion Couling had been drinking and he accepted in his police interview that he had probably been inebriated at the time. The second victim was another girl who was photographed in the familys pool and had been wearing a white top that had become see-through. His photograph concentrated on the girls breasts and not her face. "On August 28 2021 Couling sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl who was another friends daughter. The girl expressed an unwillingness to spend time in his company, but eventually agreed. He plied her with gin while he stroked her legs in a sexual manner while they were sitting on a sofa together. This lasted for about half an hour and only stopped when the girls mother arrived home early. Couling basically abused the trust of his friends, the mothers of the young victims. He told both girls not to tell anybody about his sexual abuse with them. The court was told that following his arrest his digital devices were anaylised and Couling was found to be in possessing of large quantity of indecent images of children. There were 171 images of Category A (deemed the most severe), 237 category B and 1,070 images of category C. In a statement the mother of the 54-year-old's first victim said: My world has turned upside down. I didnt believe it at first. My emotions go from being angry to feeling utter gilt that I didnt protect my little girl. I hope to wake up from this nightmare soon. My home is not the sacred place it once was. Family times no longer happen as my daughter shuts herself in her room. I dont know what to say or do. I have felt so alone during this process. There appears to be no light at the end of the tunnel. My daughter is brave, but she will not talk to me. I know deep down this situation is not my fault. Im scared she will go off the rails if she doesnt open up to somebody. The mother then spoke directly to her daughter and said: I am sorry I have let you down as a mother. I will always protect you. Im so sorry I let a monster come into our home. I will go to my grave blaming myself for what happened. The second victims mother said: I feel betrayed. This has caused me to question my own judgement in that as a mother I got it so wrong. "My daughter now has an obsession of locking all the doors and windows. She has also been suffering from nightmares. She still thinks that Couling placed cameras around the house. The third victims mother said she felt that she didnt protect her daughter enough in front of Couling and that her daughter has never worn the clothing that she wore in the pool after she was shown the photographs obtained from Coulings phone by the police. Joe Maloney defending said: You cant lock people up forever. Couling may have an interest in young girls, but he has admitted his guilt to these charges. He has listened to my legal advice that because of the strength of evidence he pleaded guilty, saving the young victims given evidence at his trial. He was acquitted by a jury in a trial of a similar nature a long time ago. This charge shouldnt be taken into account for this sentencing as he was found not guilty at this trial. Couling doesnt wish to minimise his offending and he accepts he will be receiving a custodial sentence today. He is embarrassed by what he has done. There are measures that can be imposed to stop this happening in the future. Judge Ian Lawrie QC interjected: Sometimes people are reluctant to concede their frailty. The court normally looks for somebody who recognises their wrong doing and is prepared to work with other bodies to make sure it never happens again. His pre-sentence report makes no acknowledgment of this. He has spent a lot of time minimising his involvement. The report is effectively an attempt at damage limitation. Couling pleaded guilty to two charges of sexual assault of a girl under 13 in the Cotswolds area, The sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl on August 28 2021. He also pleaded guilty to possessing 1478 indecent images of categories A, B and C. In sentencing Couling, Judge Lawrie pointed out that because he was acquitted of a very similar offence in Hampshire in the past that he must be considered of good character for this sentencing hearing. But he added that the alleged offence there was identical in every circumstance and therefore he considered the defendant as dangerous in the legal definition. Judge Lawrie told Couling: You have been before the courts before for a similar offending for which you were acquitted by a jury. As I have explained you are dangerous and your primary mitigation is that you pleaded guilty and that you didnt subject your victims in giving evidence at trial. "You need to be sentenced for a variety of sex offences. The pattern was the same in that you gained access to the girls because you were friends with their mothers. "One of the young victims gave an account of two sexual assaults while you were in the girls bedroom and touched her private parts. Even though she said no, you ignored her and carried on anyway. You also told her not to tell anybody about what had been going on. It is clear from the text on her phone that you wanted to take things further. Luckily that never happened as she told her father what you had done. I think you targeted both victims and exploited your arrangements with the girls parents. "You assaulted the second girl by plying her with gin in a bid to try and weaken her defences. It was clear what you were trying to do as you stroked the girls legs in a sexual manner for about half an hour. The girl felt pressured to take the gin and your activity only came to a halt because the girls mother arrived home early. Your explanation has little credit and you still fail to recognise what you did was wrong. Your actions showed signs of grooming. You still maintain you didnt take the picture of the semi-nude girl in the swimming pool on your phone. You didnt think it was inappropriate. I believe all your actions were because you have a fixation for young girls and were doing all this for your own sexual gratification. Despite your guilty pleas, you still have not confronted your offending. It is clear from the victim impact statement that both the victims are likely to suffer from long-term psychological impact. The judge sentenced Couling to a custodial term of four years and two months and extended his term on parole for an additional three years, which means he could be recalled to prison anytime until June 2029. Judge Lawrie concluded: I have extended the sentence because I believe you pose a risk to young children in the future. The judge placed Couling on the sex offenders register for life and made him subject to the terms of an indefinite sexual harm prevention order. After the hearing, Detective Constable Ross Webb from the Gloucestershire Police Indecent Images Unit said: The sentencing of Shaun Couling is welcomed and shows how hard we work to bring justice for victims. It doesnt bring closure to his young but brave victims however it does allow them to close one door. Unfortunately they will never forget the horrible crimes that Couling subjected them to. I ask that that people respect the privacy and anonymity of Coulings victims and their families by not speculating about who they may be.

Description

A 35-year-old man has appeared in court charged with three child sex offences. John Edward Iles faces charges of attempting to cause or incite a child to engage in penetrative sexual activity, attempting to cause a child to watch an image of sexual activity and attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child. Nataline Cheeseman, prosecuting, told Swindon Magistrates Court this morning (30 March) that the defendant had allegedly spoken to a 13-year-old girl online. However, the girl was actually a paedophile hunter from Justice for Innocence. Whilst a sting was not carried out on Iles by the group, evidence of his alleged illicit behaviour was handed to Wiltshire Police to investigate. On hearing that one of the offences is indictable only and the other two charges are inextricably linked, all three charges were sent up to Swindon Crown Court. Iles solicitor, Terry McCarthy, indicated that pleas of guilty would be entered. The defendant, of Marlow Avenue, Swindon, was released on bail with conditions not to have any unsupervised contact with children under the age of 18. Iles can have supervised contact with children under the terms of the conditions. However, the childs parent must be informed of the allegations before the court. He will appear at Swindon Crown Court next month for a plea and trial preparation hearing.

Description

A SERIAL sex offender with a perverse sense of entitlement left a vulnerable woman feeling disgusting and awful after he raped and sexually assaulted her. Mustafa Naro Ali exploited the sex worker after seeing her in his street, approaching her and arranging to have sex with her for 20. But when they got inside, Ali treated her like a ragdoll, trying to rip her clothes off and was so aggressive she began to cry. It left her with internal injuries and the 30-year-old was described as having little if no regard for the victims of his crimes referring to her as just a sex worker in a pre-sentence report. He was jailed for 10 years at Portsmouth Crown Court on Friday (March 18), with Recorder Simon Foster labelling him dangerous. Ali, now of no fixed abode but previously of East Street, had been convicted of one count of rape and one count of sexual assault in a trial at Swindon Crown Court last year. Prosecutor Rob Welling said the victim, an alcoholic and heroin user, was near Alis address collecting a debt in April 2021 when he approached her. The defendant very quickly established in his own mind she was a sex worker, and arranged to have sex for 20, he told the court. They went back to his flat, and once they were alone, almost immediately he tried to rip her clothes off, treating her like a rag doll. Mr Welling continued: [He] treated her so aggressively that she protested and cried, but he didnt care. She said she was crying throughout and when the defendant eventually left, he left the flat telling her he was going to get some more alcohol. He said that the defendant knew from her appearance she was a drug user and exploited [her] as a result]. His attitude was he paid for it, he was going to have it, regardless. That is borne out by his attitudes with the author of the pre-sentence report. The court was also told about Alis previous crimes. Among the list of his sexual offences include licking his lips and asking a group of 13-year-old girls if they wanted to come back to his flat to smoke drugs, masturbating on a bench in public and pressing himself against two women shopping in Boots. This was a defendant that could not contain his sexual urges and had little if no regard for the victims of his crimes, Mr Welling concluded. In a victim impact statement, the victim said: What happened to me made me feel disgusting and awful, I was scared to report what happened because I am ashamed of what I am. My life is a mess and I sex work on the street. I didnt think the police would believe me and I thought Id be laughed out of court. My experience was very different. On the date I found out the verdict I felt I had some worth as a human being. The outcome of my case has helped me to remind myself that I have to be positive and work towards recovery. Sentencing Ali, Recorder Foster said that Alis aggressive behaviour led to the victim withdrawing consent for sex. The ongoing effects of what you did to her are only too evident, he continued. As I have said she was plainly a person in a vulnerable state. Your antecedence revealed in my judgement a troubling past. The author of the report has come to the conclusion that you are a very high risk of serious harm to the public, that harm being of sexual abuse and sexual violence. Your attitude to this offence bears that out. In interview you denied, as you did at trial, there being any penetration. You claimed consent, and your attitude which was made plain in the course of the preparation of the report, illustrated what you went on to say, that she is just a sex worker. You acted out a perverse sense of entitlement, and attitudes like that are abhorrent to all right-thinking members of the public. Ali was jailed for eight-and-a-half years for rape, and three years for sexual assault, which will be served concurrently. However, Recorder Foster also sentenced the defendant for a separate assault, where in 2020 he hit a prison officer with a mop and bit an officer on the shoulder at HMP Bullingdon. The attack has seen the officer look for another job. He was given another one year and six months for assault occasioning actual bodily harm and assaulting an emergency worker which he admitted and will serve the sentences consecutively. It resulted in a total jail sentence of 10 years. On release, Ali will be subject to an extended licence period of four years and a sexual harm prevention order.

Description

A Swindon sex offender has uploaded dozens of photographs featuring girls and women to social media following his conviction for sexually assaulting women on a train. The images are believed to have been captured by Dr Prabhat Sakya, 50, who was sentenced to a suspended prison sentence for touching women he trapped by sitting next to them. Before and after his conviction, he has kept his personal Instagram account up to date with buildings, art and females many, very obviously, aged under 18. Whilst it is legal to photograph or video record anybody in a public place, including children, his photographs have caused some concern in the community. The images posted rarely include males unless they are accompanied by a female. Others feature young girls wearing school uniforms, or teenage girls walking alone in the street. One set of photographs posted on 11 October last year featured two schoolgirls wearing uniforms walking down the street. One photograph was captioned Schoolgirls, whilst another said Fair maiden. Weeks prior to his court hearing, he also added an image of a womans lower body, which appears to have been taken while the photographer was sitting next to the female. The caption said: Morning flirt. Despite his conviction at Swindon Magistrates Court in October last year, photos of young females are still being posted on the Instagram account. On New Years Day 2022, he uploaded a photograph of an adult woman wearing black knee-high boots and added the description Kinky boots. Several days later, he added an image of two young girls estimated to be in their early teens sitting on a bench at Swindon Railway Station. A woman, who wishes to remain anonymous, alerted Wiltshire 999s to the social media account some months ago and, despite it appearing to be legal, it was reported to the police. Its really quite concerning that a man can be convicted of sexual offences and then walk around the streets photographing young girls, she said. Adding: Something must be done to stop him, its creepy. It should be allowed when he is a registered sex offender. The police should be looking into it but I know they wont as they say hes doing nothing wrong. At Swindon Magistrates Court on Thursday (28 October 2021), he was sentenced to 52 weeks imprisonment suspended for 24 months and told to register a sex offender for ten years. Sakya, of Bude Road, targeted women on a train between London and Swindon, and had a bulge in his crotch area, which he was touching with his hand during one of the attacks.

Description

A man communicated with two young girls unsupervised in the street despite being banned from having contact with children under the terms of his sexual risk order (SRO).

Serial offender Patrick Cunnington, 24, admitted a ninth breach of the SRO which was granted in 2018 and prohibits him from communicating with anyone under the age of 16 at Swindon Magistrates Court this morning (8 September).

The defendant, who was on bail for two other breaches of his order, was brought before the court after being arrested on Tuesday (7 September) and remanded in police custody overnight. He was supported in the courtroom by his girlfriend of eight months.

Crown prosecutor Pauline Lambert said Cunnington, of Prospect Hill, Old Town, was living in a shared house and whilst outside the property, he would talk to his neighbour who was unaware of his offending history and her two children aged 9 and 11.

In the mothers statement, she described him as very friendly as he always took the time to speak with her children, asking about what they did over the school holidays and about their new hamster. She estimated hed spoken to the children on around 30 occasions between April and 5 September this year.

He added his new neighbour on Facebook on 21 August, and she accepted. When the woman posted a photograph of her girls on the social platform wearing their school uniform, Cunnington left a comment saying Awh, have fun, along with laughing emojis.

The womans ex-partner contacted her and asked why she was friends with him on Facebook, but she was completely unaware of his history. Immediately Googling him, she said the results made her feel sick and she contacted Wiltshire Police to report his behaviour.

For most of the occasions he communicated with her children, she was present in the background, but for many others, they were alone and Cunnington was unsupervised with them.

When police attended this address armed with this new information, he lunged at them with his fists clenched. He was restrained and handcuffed to prevent any assaults. After hed calmed down, his handcuffs were removed and he was transported to custody.

Ms Lambert asked magistrates to refuse the defendant bail due to the fact this new offence was committed whilst on bail ahead of sentencing on 21 September. She also asked that the case was sent to the crown court for sentencing, concerned the benchs powers would be insufficient.

He does not comply with this order, the current order, and does not comply with his bail conditions, she told the court.

Adding: There are no bail conditions which could be in place to stop him re-offending. He should be remanded in custody for fear of further offending.

The court heard how Cunnington is categorised as a high risk of harm to children.

Charlotte Frizzell, defending, opposed the remand application made by the prosecution, saying sending her client to prison would not help him.

Every day in passing, he says hello, and he does converse with them.

He admits hes seen them on their own and would say hello. He feels it would be odd that he does not speak to them when their mother is not around, he feels it would make them think theres something wrong with them.

There is no underlying cause, he was being neighbourly, they spoke a lot.

She [the childrens mother] has been around and asked his girlfriend to babysit her children. He told his girlfriend, who is in court supporting him, that it could not happen.

Hes quite immature for his age and he has significant trust issues with people in authority.

Magistrates, after retiring for a few minutes to discuss the matter, decided to remand Cunnington into custody. They committed the case for sentence at Swindon Crown Court in October.

Description

A CHILD rapist from west Swindon has been jailed for 19 years. Jailing John Whelan at Swindon Crown Court on Monday, Judge Jason Taylor QC told him: Your grooming and manipulation was nothing more than a selfish and perverted desire to prioritise your sexual gratification over their welfare. Recent changes to the law mean that the 64-year-old will spend at least two thirds of that 19 year sentence behind bars. Once he is released he must spend a further two years on licence. Whelan was found guilty earlier this month of indecent assault, gross indecency with a child and rape. The offences were committed between the mid-1990s and 2000s against two girls, both of whom were under 11 when the abuse began. His younger victim, who was raped by Whelan after being made to perform sex acts on him while they played games in his man cave, told the court on Monday that she had felt totally and utterly powerless. She said: I have carried around the weight of the world on my shoulders for most of my life. The older woman said Whelan had stolen her childhood and the person she could have been. Mitigating, Whelans barrister Clare Evans said her client had been a hardworking family man whos done everything he can to support his family. John Whelan's custody shot Picture: WILTSHIRE POLICE During the trial, jurors heard how Whelan turned his abuse of the children into games, including instructing one seven-year-old girl to play hide and seek with his private parts after covering his genitals with a blanket. The abuse was perpetrated from the mid-90s to mid-2000s. The older girl claimed Whelan had occasionally babysat her while her mother was out at work and she had also been looked after at his family home. Jurors were told he had arrived to babysit her at her home with what he called special films pornography that he would make her watch while she sat on his lap. He was said to have molested her; touching her sexually and getting her to touch him. The touching continued at his own home, as they played video games in his man cave, although he would not expose himself at the house. Opening the case to the jury last week, prosecutor David Scutt said: She said this: It was our secret, it was our little game and that, no doubt was what he was telling her as that young girl. As she got older she had refused to take part in the games, she claimed. When her mum switched work shifts the girl no longer needed to be babysat by the man. On the occasions she went around to his house she stayed close to her mum, Mr Scutt said. The older girl said she had noticed Whelan taking an interest in another younger girl. They would both be called upstairs to watch TV in his bedroom. On occasion he would be wearing a towel, she claimed. The younger girl claimed Whelan had begun sexually abusing her when she was around seven. She said the man had shown her pornographic playing cards and websites. He had been grooming her, Mr Scutt said. He was getting her to look at it, this is to say the stuff on the computer, and what was described as his game; it was made into play for this young child. He would get her to look at videos, she said, and he told her what he wanted her to do. The girl claimed she had been made to touch him sexually and perform oral sex on him. On one occasion he raped her, she said. [He said] he was going to make her happy like the ladies in the videos, Mr Scutt said. One victim said she had experienced urinary problems during her childhood. During Whelans sentencing hearing, the judge suggested that could be the result of a sexually transmitted infection. The abuse was reported to police in early 2019. In December the previous year, the younger woman had told her mother and father she had been raped by Whelan. Her brother was instrumental in persuading her to go to the police, jurors heard. The woman had told her then partner later her husband about the abuse. The older woman came forward after being told by her mother that the younger complainant had gone to the police. Interviewed by police last year, Whelan denied sexually assaulting the girls. He said the pornographic cards belonged to his late father. Sentencing Whelan, Judge Taylor said: You forced [your victims] to live with this shameful secret for years, knowing as they did that if they ever came forward it would go nuclear. It took tremendous courage for them to come forward but at last they feel back in control for the first time for 20 and 15 years respectively. The judge commented that Whelan, formerly of Stamford Close, Toothill, but appearing in court via video link from Bristol prison, had been shaking his head as he summarised the evidence against him.

Description

The victim of a serial sex offender says when she learned he had offended again she felt "sick to her stomach". Peter Kis was jailed for two years at Swindon Crown Court on Friday after being caught performing a sex act in front of two young girls. It was the latest in a string of offences involving young children, dating back to the 1960s. One woman he abused when she was a girl says she and other victims had been let down by the legal system. Swindon Crown Court heard Kis's latest offence happened on 2 May when he indecently exposed himself to an eight-year-old girl and her six-year-old sister who were playing near his home in Barnum Court, Swindon. Kis was arrested the same day and pleaded guilty to one count of engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child. His previous convictions include an eight-year sentence for indecently assaulting two girls in 1967, a suspended sentence in 1971 for gross indecency with a child and a three-and-a-half-year jail sentence for sexually assaulting a seven-year-old girl in 2018 'Career as a sexual abuser' Speaking after Friday's sentence, one victim - now in her 30s - said she was shocked to hear he was still offending. "I definitely didn't consider that he would still be out there doing this to other girls like me," she said. "I feel let down because I reported this when I was eight and I just feel that perhaps if I had been taken more seriously and Peter had been monitored a bit more then he wouldn't be out there still doing this. "The legal system has effectively allowed this man to comfortably continue what is a 50-year career as a sexual abuser." She said that Kis had changed her life, but not destroyed it, and that "short sentences were not enough". "I really hope the justice system has a serious think about how they sentence dangerous individuals like him. It needs to be done more efficiently and effectively," she added. A Probation Service spokesman said: "While sentencing is a matter for independent judges, the offender was robustly monitored while on licence by diligent probation staff." The Crown Prosecution Service said its regional Rape and Serious Sexual Offences (RASSO) team worked closely with police "to ensure justice was delivered swiftly."

Description

A RAPIST has been ordered back to prison after police found vile child sex abuse images on his computer. David Stephens was jailed for life in 1999 after he was convicted of five rapes and a series of sexual assaults on children. The Wiltshire paedophile was released on licence in 2012. But now hes been sent back inside after detectives found 49 sickening images, including some showing children as young as five being molested. Sentencing the 64-year-old to a further eight months imprisonment for three counts of making indecent images of children, Judge Peter Crabtree said: Anyone who engages in downloading child pornography is involved in fuelling a business which results in those children being the subject of psychological and harm sometimes over many, many years. Stephens long history with the courts began in 1971. In 1984 he was accused of presiding over a reign of terror in Chippenham, where he lived at the time, by committing 37 burglaries and thefts from clothes lines taking womens underwear and childrens clothing to satisfy a sick lust. Stephens also stole documents and photographs belonging to the women from whom he stole, using them to compile dossiers on his victims. In 1999, he was convicted at Swindon Crown Court of a series of five rapes and eight other assaults, including on girls under-13. His jail term was bumped up to life imprisonment by appeal court justices. He was released in April 2012. Under his licence conditions, registered sex offender Stephens was prevented from having access to electronic devices capable of accessing the internet except where police gave the go-ahead. Acting on a tip-off, police officers raided Stephens home on August 28. They seized a number of electronic items including a Dell computer. A forensic trawl of the computer found Stephens had downloaded indecent images of children the day before and had deleted them on the morning of the raid. Evidence pointed to Stephens searching for terms like barely legal. Stephens, of no fixed address, pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children. Alistair Haggerty, defending, said his client had made full admissions, pleaded guilty at the first opportunity and was remorseful. Seven years had passed without incident since Stephens was released from prison on licence, he added. By comparison to many similar cases that come before the courts, Stephens was in possession of relatively few indecent images.