Kent 2025-09-10

Michael Millson 39

Convicted sex offender who admitted to multiple breaches of a court order.

Profile Picture
Offender ID: O-7852

Locations

Palmerston Road, Chatham, Medway, ME4

Description

A convicted sex offender from Chatham who admitted to multiple breaches of a court order and failing to comply with notification requirements has been jailed.

Michael Millson, 39, was issued a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) in February 2024 following a conviction for offences that included possession of indecent images of children.

Investigation

The restrictions stipulated that he should not be in possession of an internet-enabled device without written approval from police.

He was further forbidden from installing software on such a device that would allow browsing history to be deleted, or any apps that could anonymise the web user’s identity.

On 26 June 2024, Millson, who had been released from prison on licence, was recalled due to poor behaviour and he was arrested. Whilst in custody, he was found to have a mobile phone - which had not been disclosed to police, and on which banned apps and file-sharing software were installed - in direct breach of the SHPO.

In addition, a review by officers of Millson’s phone’s camera roll confirmed that several indecent images had been downloaded to the device.

Charged

The following day, 18 charges were brought against Millson including eight breaches of a SHPO, six counts of making indecent images, three breaches of sex offender notification requirements and possession of an indecent image.

Jailed

Millson, formerly of Palmerston Road, pleaded guilty and, on Thursday 4 September 2025 at Maidstone Crown Court, was sentenced to three years in prison.

Detective Constable Zoe Wornham said:

‘We apply for court orders such as these so that convicted sex offenders can be closely monitored once they have served time in prison. This helps us to safeguard potential future victims and prevent further crimes from being committed. Millson clearly breached the conditions imposed by the court and was rightly put back in prison as a result.

‘Offenders who are released and are subject to restrictions should remember that they will be made to face the consequences if they fail to adhere to them.’

Source Update